CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RE:VIVE

USPTO serial 90361115

RE:VIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNING, LUKE CASH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RE:VIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl M. Davis II

Carl M. Davis II BAKER DONELSON3414 PEACHTREE ROAD NE STE 1500ATLANTA, GA 30326UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing healthcare services referral services in the nature of physician referralsACTIVE—
044providing membership services program for individuals, employers and associations in the nature of providing telemedicine healthcare services, healthcare services, primary and urgent healthcare services, health, mental health, lifestyle wellness, and nutritional counseling, and prescription fulfillment services in the nature of preparation of prescriptions in pharmaciesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2021PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2021GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2021GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2021EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Dec 13, 2021CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 28, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 24, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance