Drawing for OKI JIN

USPTO serial 90369189

OKI JIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
QUEEN, ESTHER FELICIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OKI JIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John K. Kim

John K. Kim Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP201 East Washington Street, Suite 1200Phoenix, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, t-shirts, sleeveless t-shirts, blouses, dresses, and leggings; outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, and hats; underwear, bras, and pantiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 6, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance