Drawing for SELECTCON

USPTO serial 90369203

SELECTCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS-RIGGS, LESLIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SELECTCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman Dentons US LLPP.O. Box 1302Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Musical recordings; Downloadable software for use in relation to entertainment services, music, music publishing services, music distribution services and music subscription services, namely, for publishing and distributing music onlineACTIVE—
035Music distribution services, namely, on-line distributorship services in the field of digital musicACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online music, not downloadable; Music, namely, providing online non-downloadable music; Music publishing services; Music subscription services, namely, providing on-line music, not downloadable, for a monthly fee; music distribution services in the nature of providing online non-downloadable music; music subscription services in the nature of providing online non-downloadable musicACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services in relation to entertainment services, music, music publishing services, music distribution services and music subscription services, namely, software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for filing online tax returns; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for use in relation to entertainment services, music, music publishing services, music distribution services, namely, for publishing and distributing music online; Software as a service (SAAS) services in relation to entertainment services, music, music publishing services, music distribution services, namely, software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for publishing and distributing music online; Providing on-line, non-downloadable software for use in music distribution management in relation to entertainment services, music, music publishing services, music distribution services and music subscription services, namely, for publishing and distributing music online; Software as a service being SAAS services featuring software for use in music distribution management in relation to entertainment services, music, music publishing services, music distribution services and music subscription services, namely, for publishing and distributing music onlineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 24, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 13, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance