Drawing for BANTER & BARBER

USPTO serial 90375130

BANTER & BARBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BANTER & BARBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory N. Brescia

Gregory N. Brescia GORDON & REES LLP500 MAMARONECK AVE.SUITE 503HARRISON, NY 10528

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Barber services; Barber shop services; Barbering services; Beauty salon services; Hair salon services; Hair salon services, namely, hair cutting, styling, coloring, and hair extension services; Hair salon services, namely, treatments to protect hair from effects of exposure to sunlight, heat, humidity and chlorinated water; Hair styling; Providing advice and information in the fields of hairstyling, haircare, and hair maintenance; none of the foregoing for use in connection with ear and body piercing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 16, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 23, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 3, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance