USPTO serial 90376050
CYNC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYNC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Cleveland, OH
East Cleveland, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane H. Dreger
Duane H. Dreger CESARI AND MCKENNA, LLPONE LIBERTY SQUARE, SUITE 310BOSTON, MA 02109United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Home automation hubs comprised of computer hardware and recorded and downloadable software for controlling networked home automation devices and connected lighting, temperature and security apparatus; water and air quality sensors being electronic-based instruments for measuring environmental parameters in the nature of water and air quality; smart electric doorbells; computer hardware to be integrated into electronic home automation devices to enable control of home automation devices by an application; downloadable and recorded computer software to be integrated into electronic home automation devices to enable electronic home automation devices to be controlled by an application; computer hardware and recorded and downloadable software to enable networked home automation devices to be remotely controlled | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable computer software to be integrated into electronic home automation devices to enable electronic home automation devices to be controlled by an application | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2022 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |