USPTO serial 90379332
BONDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2022
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with BONDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hemavathy Perumal
Hemavathy Perumal SHERMAN IP LLP1519 26th StreetSanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Gift boxes comprised primarily of popcorn, candy, chocolates and chocolate-based ready to eat candies and snacks, grain-based chips, flour-based chips, corn-based chips, pita chips, dipping sauces, tea-based beverages, coffee-based beverages, cocoa-based beverages, barbecue dry rubs, smores, licorice, cereal bars, muesli bars, granola snacks, gum sweets, gummy candies, cookies | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 1, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |