USPTO serial 90379925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yoon S. Ham
Yoon S. Ham HAUPTMAN HAM, LLP2318 MILL ROADSUITE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing a web-based system and on-line portal for customers to participate in on-line gaming, operation and coordination of game tournaments and leagues for recreational computer game playing purposes; Provision of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the internet; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Providing on-line computer games; Providing an on-line computer game in the field of militaristic multi-player fights; Gaming services in the nature of Conducting online computer game tournaments; Entertainment services, namely, providing an online computer game; Providing information on-line relating to computer games and computer enhancements for games; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Rental of computer game software; Production of video and computer game software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |