USPTO serial 90389554
IT TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IT TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
Andrew S. Ehard MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.P.O. BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial investment brokerage services relating to investment funds, mutual funds, pooled funds, wrap account products, segregated funds, and securities-based investment products; financial management services relating to investment funds, mutual funds, pooled funds, wrap account products, segregated funds, and securities-based investment products; financial investment in the field of securities relating to investment funds, mutual funds, pooled funds, wrap account products, segregated funds, and securities-based investment products; financial investment services, namely the distribution of investment funds, mutual funds, pooled funds, wrap account products, segregated funds, and securities-based investment products; financial investment counseling services; financial planning; providing investment management services and investment management services related to customized investment portfolios to private clients including high net worth individuals, family trusts and holding companies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |