Drawing for WAKE-UP CALL

USPTO serial 90389844

WAKE-UP CALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KNIGHT, TROY FRANK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAKE-UP CALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID L. OPPENHUIZEN

DAVID L. OPPENHUIZEN OPPENHUIZEN LAW PLC5960 TAHOE DR. SESTE. 105GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements; Nutritional supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 30, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 30, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 2023EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 6, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 7, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 2, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 2, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 2, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 1, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 1, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 26, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance