Drawing for TRANSFORMASHIELD

USPTO serial 90390221

TRANSFORMASHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSFORMASHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK M BERGIN

PATRICK M BERGIN VON BRIESEN & ROPER, S.C.411 E. WISCONSIN AVENUE, SUITE 1000MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Transition and implementation services, namely, implementing a detailed checklist to help clients adopt new procedures and plans in the fields of custodial and janitorial servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 8, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 21, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 4, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 14, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 18, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2021MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance