USPTO serial 90390443
BANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
YAN GOODWIN
YAN GOODWIN LATIMER LEVAY FYOCK LLC55 WEST MONROE STSTE 1100CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and apparel, namely, tops, shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, hoodies, vests, cardigans, coats, jackets, blazers, suits, dress pants, pants, shorts, jeans, overalls, blouses, dresses, gowns, wedding dresses, skirts, knit tops, boxer shorts, pajamas, nightgowns, undershirts, tank tops, lingerie, bodysuits, halter tops, camisoles, lounge wear, underwear, footwear, slips being underclothing, swimwear, socks, hats, caps being headwear, scarves, shawls, gloves, mittens, ear muffs, veils; exercise and aerobic wear, namely, moisture-wicking sports pants, women's athletic tops with build-in bras, yoga pants; outerwear, namely, coats, hats, gloves; sportswear, namely, lounge pants, polo knit tops, khakis, jeans | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |