Drawing for AMBIQ ENDPOINT INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 90393014

AMBIQ ENDPOINT INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMBIQ ENDPOINT INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexis P. Grilli

Alexis P. Grilli NIXON PEABODY LLP799 9TH STREET N.W., SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic circuits; Electronic circuits for low power devices; Electronic components in the nature of low power microcontrollers; Electronic control circuits for low power communications; Integrated circuits; Microcontrollers; Microcontrollers for internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; Semi-conductors; Semiconductor chips; Semiconductor devices; Electric and electronic circuits; system-on-a-chip (SOC); Computer hardware, namely, endpoint artificial intelligence (AI) devices for wearables, hearables, smart home, industrial IoT, IoT, and smartcards; Computer hardware, namely, endpoint devices in the nature of battery-powered mobile and portable devices intended for personal wellness, predictive and preventive maintenance, smarthome, factory automation, asset tracking, and contactless payment/ID/security; mobile devices using artificial intelligence for home automation; mobile devices using artificial intelligence for detecting anomaly on the spot, extracting insights for real-time decision-making; microcontrollers for artificial intelligence; microcontrollers for artificial intelligence enabled devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2022GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 5, 2022GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 5, 2022CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 18, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance