Drawing for ASSET GRAPH

USPTO serial 90393939

ASSET GRAPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASSET GRAPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew T. Harry

Andrew T. Harry Xsensus, LLP100 DAINGERFIELD ROAD, SUITE 402Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for storing information on and visualizing business assets, such as information technology systems, user identities, virtual computer systems, computer applications, data, cloud environmentsACTIVE—
042Computer services in the nature of displaying graph databases utilized to provide visualizations of business assets, such as information technology systems, user identities, computer applications, data, cloud environmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 5, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 5, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 5, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 4, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 14, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 14, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 14, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance