USPTO serial 90398041
GOOD TO GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOOD TO GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly M. Maynard
Kimberly M. Maynard FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC28 LIBERTY STREETNEW YORK, NY 10005United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cookies; cookies suitable for a ketogenic diet; low sugar or no sugar cookies; cookies made from nut flour; grain-free cookies; gluten free cookies; cookie bites; brownies; brownies suitable for a ketogenic diet; low sugar or no sugar brownies; brownies made from nut flour; grain-free brownies; gluten free brownies; brownie bites; blondies; blondies suitable for a ketogenic diet; low sugar or no sugar blondies; blondies made from nut flour; grain-free blondies; gluten free blondies; cake mixes suitable for a ketogenic diet; grain-free cake mixes; cake mixes made from nut flour; gluten free cake mixes; pre-packaged cake mixes sold in microwaveable containers; cake mixes packaged in a microwaveable cup; single serve cake mixes packaged in a cup in which the cake is prepared; cake mixes sold pre-packaged in a microwaveable container | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |