USPTO serial 90398227
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Norfolk, VA
WOODSTOCK, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Young
James L. Young WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A.121 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, SUITE 1100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal building materials, namely, brackets for components of decking, railing and stair systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Overlay systems for indoor and outdoor platforms and floors, comprising non-metal tiles, coping, skirting, stairs, and railings, and also including mats for use as load support surfaces for the construction industry; non-metal building materials, namely, ceramic tiles, porcelain tiles, coping, skirting, stairs and railings | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction services, namely, overlaying indoor and outdoor platforms and floors with non-metal tiles; construction of stair systems, railing systems, sunrooms, outdoor kitchens and outdoor fireplaces; hardscaping services; constructing decks | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Landscape gardening | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |