Drawing for MODERN CHEF

USPTO serial 90398544

MODERN CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODERN CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean K. Owens

Sean K. Owens WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP441 VINE STREET2700 CAREW TOWERCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Kitchen appliances, namely, electric food blenders, electric juicers, electric mixers for household purposes, electric spice grinders, electric can openers, electric milk frothers, electric coffee grinders, electric food processorsACTIVE—
011Electric kettles; sous vide machines; kitchen appliances, namely, electric coffee makers, electric tea makers in the nature of electric tea kettle, air fryer, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens, electric pizza cooking ovens, electric waffle makers, electric churro makers, electric grills, electric skillets, electric griddles, electric espresso machines, electric multi-cookers in the nature of electric pressure cookers and air fryers, electric panini makers, electric popcorn makers in the nature of electric popcorn poppers, electric cooktop burners, electric ice cream makers, electric egg steamers for household purposes, electric buffet servers in the nature of electric food warmers, electric food steamers, electric omelet makers, electric corndog makers, electric pretzel makers, electric cupcake makersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 23, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 1, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 19, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2021GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 7, 2021GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 7, 2021CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 16, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance