USPTO serial 90406764
I.MX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JANSON, ANDREW KYLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I.MX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eindhoven, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA R. ADWERE
CYNTHIA R. ADWERE LAW OFFICE OF CYNTHIA R. ADWERE2625 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD #360PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microprocessors, microcontrollers; application processors being microprocessors; microprocessor controls; microprocessor cores; crossover processors being microcontrollers; crossover applications processors being microprocessors; application processors for multimedia and display applications being microprocessors | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 10, 2024 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 19, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 13, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |