USPTO serial 90408273
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Baird
Stephen R. Baird GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products, namely, shampoos and conditioners, facial moisturizers, body moisturizers, hair moisturizers, human body conditioning and skin treatment lotions, human body conditioning and skin treatment creams, anti-aging and stretch mark creams, lotion and cream for hands, nails, skin, face, hair, varicose veins, foot and leg muscles, and joints, depilatory lotions and creams, shaving lotions and creams, skin treatments, namely, lotions and creams for treating dry and damaged skin, anti-aging, firming, antiwrinkle, stretch marks, under eye and eyelid firming; gels, namely, depilatory gels, shaving gels, shower gels, moisturizing and anti-aging gels, stretch mark gels, body oils, cosmetic oils, hair oils, beauty serums, petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes, sun protection creams, soaps for personal use, facial soap, bath soap, soaps for body care, skin soaps, liquid soaps, bar soaps, human body sprays used as personal deodorants and fragrances, scented fabric refresher sprays, body washes, shower gels, bubble bath; skin scrubs, facial scrub, hand scrub, foot scrub, body scrub, beauty masks, body masks, facial masks, hair masks, skin masks, peeling cream | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |