USPTO serial 90408282
SINGULAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SINGULAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Baird
Stephen R. Baird GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services; property evaluation, property management, financial analysis and consultation, financial asset management, financial management, financial valuations, banking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |