USPTO serial 90411422
CLOAK PHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOAK PHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Citadel Mobile Communications, Inc.
Jericho, NY
Other trademarks owned by Citadel Mobile Communications, Inc.
Citadel Mobile Communications, Inc.
Jericho, NY
Other trademarks owned by Citadel Mobile Communications, Inc.
FORTRESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
JERICHO, NY
Other trademarks owned by FORTRESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Laurence
John Laurence TCP Law, PLLC325 East 79 StreetSuite 7ANew York, NY 10075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable computer software development tools for creation of mobile internet applications for mobile devices; downloadable middleware for software application integration on mobile devices; downloadable computer software for use in transmitting and receiving data over computer networks and global communication networks for mobile phones; downloadable computer software for managing communications and data exchange among and between mobile devices and desktop computers; downloadable computer software, namely, an electronic financial platform that accommodates multiple types of payment, including payment via cryptocurrency, in an integrated mobile phone environment and web based environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | electronic currency transfer services; electronic funds transfer; electronic cryptocurrency payment processing for software purchases; secure electronic funds transfer by telecommunications; cryptocurrency trading services, namely, clearing and reconciling financial cryptocurrency transactions via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable computer software for use in transmitting and receiving data over computer networks and global communication networks for mobile phones; providing temporary use of on-line, nondownloadable computer software for managing communications and data exchange among and between mobile devices and desktop computers; providing temporary use of on-line, nondownloadable computer software, namely, an electronic financial platform that accommodates multiple types of payment, including payment via cryptocurrency, in an integrated mobile phone environment and web based environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Citadel Mobile Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Citadel Mobile Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FORTRESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLOAK PHONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |