USPTO serial 90415891
FBZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RYDLAND, STEPHANIE DIANA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FBZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ji'an, Jiangxi Province, CN
Ji'an, Jiangxi Province, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry G. Chow
Xie LiuxiangQuanjiang Town, Suichuan CountyNo. 39, Lingxia, Yungang VillageJi'an, Jiangxi Province, 343900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Balloons; Sailboards; Trampolines; Archery bows; Badminton rackets; Billiard tables; Body-building apparatus; Boxing bags; Dice games; Dumbbells; Exercise treadmills; Fishing lures; Fishing tackle; Footballs; Infant toys; Inflatable mattress swimming floats for recreational use; Jigsaw puzzles; Jigsaw and manipulative puzzles; Jump ropes; Pet toys; Plush toys; Radio-controlled toy vehicles; Skateboard trucks; Smart robot toys; Surf boards; Swimming rings; Table tennis nets; Table tennis rebound board; Tennis rackets; Toy drones; Water toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2022 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2022 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 12, 2022 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |