Drawing for VOYCE

USPTO serial 90431718

VOYCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOYCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexis Crawford Douglas

Alexis Crawford Douglas K&L GATES LLPP.O. BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pharmacy prescription fulfillment machines, namely, prescription collationACTIVE—
009Optical pill counting machine comprising computer hardware and recorded operating software for prescription dispensing and verification; automatic and semi-automatic dispensing systems, sold empty, comprising computer hardware and recorded operating software, and computer peripherals for dispensing pills, tablets and capsules; downloadable and recorded computer software for controlling medicinal pill, capsule and tablet dispensing machines and workstations consisting of computer processors, pill singulation and dispensing machines, electronic displays, and optical scanners; automated pharmacy machines, namely, machines that count, sort, weigh and bottle pills; pharmacy prescription fulfillment machines, namely, prescription collationACTIVE—
020Pharmacy prescription cabinets for storing filled prescriptions prior to pick-up or packaging for use with software and hardware that collates the prescriptionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance