USPTO serial 90434256
PROTOLYTIC UR EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2022
- Examiner
- BURCH, JILLIAN RENEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with PROTOLYTIC UR EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Mason, Esq.
Monica B. Mason, Esq. TRENAM LAW101 E. KENNEDY BLVD.SUITE 2700TAMPA, FL 33602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | medical insurance case and utilization review and insurance claims adjustment services for healthcare purchasers and payors and providers and Medicare beneficiaries | ACTIVE | Oct 4, 2022 |
| 042 | Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring software for making an automated utilization review determination by providing analysis using proprietary state guidelines, information from evidence-based medicine and other algorithms and rules; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as an automated application used to obtain and enter medical requests, namely, requests for authorization received by insurance companies and employers in the claims management process, to keep track of all request for authorization deadlines, timeframes, follow up requirements and compliance with state laws, and to prevent penalties, fines and automatic approval, to provide analysis using proprietary state guidelines, information from evidence-based medicine and other algorithms and rules on the diagnosis, medical services, medications, and equipment requests based on the diagnosis, consider treatment options, past treatments completed and other factors, to speed up the review process and provide documentation for medical decisions, to keep track of new requests, additional information requests made to medical providers involved with a request for authorization, when information is received, new filing deadlines, and other actions taken; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as an automated application to review the state of jurisdiction for medical requests, namely, requests for authorization received by insurance companies and employers in the claims management process and determine when peer-review is required, and automatically send required letters to the reviewer, patient, attorney, insurance adjuster, and any other parties as required by state law, and to keep track of changing response filing deadlines affected by the peer-review process to comply with state laws; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as an automated application used to determine whether final determination letters must be sent to the requesting physician, patient, patient's attorney, claims adjuster, and any other party as required by state law, to confirm that all the legal requirements have been met, and to calculate the complex billing once request for proposal reviews have been completed, and to maintain records of all documents sent with attachments, all processes performed, and review peer-review billing rates; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as an automated application used to interface with medical insurance claims and bill-review systems, to update claims, to flag bill review systems with final determinations, and update claims regarding denials and payment status | ACTIVE | Oct 4, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ProtoLytic, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ProtoLytic, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ProtoLytic, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROTOLYTIC UR EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2022 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |