USPTO serial 90455334
RE:FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIFTU, BENIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RE:FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Radnor, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia Smink Rogowski
Patricia Smink Rogowski ROGOWSKI LAW LLC501 SILVERSIDE ROAD, SUITE 11WILMINGTON, DE 19809UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | household cleaning sponges; scouring sponges; kitchen sponges; dish cleaning brushes; toilet cleaning brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |