USPTO serial 90458599
CRF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION EDUCATE. ENGAGE. EMPOWER.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION EDUCATE. ENGAGE. EMPOWER.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sara Miller
Sara Miller ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 SOUTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pamphlets, newsletters, books and printed educational materials on civics, government, law, debate, civil conversation, argument, and etiquette | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 2020 |
| 035 | Charitable services, namely, recruiting and organizing volunteers for community educational service projects; internship placement services for students | ACTIVE | Dec 7, 2020 |
| 041 | Educational and entertainment programs, namely, mock trials, seminars, and training programs, all for the purpose of teaching children and students about civics, government, law, debate, civil conversation, argument, and etiquette; educational services, namely, conducting mentoring, classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the fields of civics, government, law, debate, civil conversation, argument, and etiquette; educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of mock trials conducted as competitions for students; educational services, namely, offering online classes and training programs in the fields of civics, government, law, debate, civil conversation, argument, and etiquette; educational services, namely, conducting programs in the fields of government, civics, and constitutional rights involving interactions between students and judges, representatives, and other governmental figures and organizations; educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of government, civics, and constitutional rights involving role-playing exercises, interactions, and dialogues between law enforcement officers and children; educational services, namely, educational programs and trainings in the fields of civics, government, and the law, and distributing course material in electronic format in connection therewith; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring civics, government, and the law; providing training services to teachers in the fields of civics, government, law, debate, civil conversation, argument, and etiquette | ACTIVE | Dec 7, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Constitutional Rights Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CRF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION EDUCATE. ENGAGE. EMPOWER.
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 3, 2021 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 3, 2021 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |