USPTO serial 90459110
WHITE OAKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, RAYMOND KANGMIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITE OAKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Etobicoke, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gordon E. R. Troy, Esq.
Gordon E. R. Troy, Esq. Gordon E. R. Troy, PCP.O. Box 67Windsor, VT 05089UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic wear, namely, pants, yoga pants, leggings and workout pants ; Casual clothing, namely, pants, yoga pants, leggings and workout pants; Casual wear, namely, pants, yoga pants, leggings and workout pants; Dress clothing, namely, pants; Exercise wear, namely, pants, yoga pants, leggings and workout pants; Golf wear, namely, pants, and leggings; Gym wear, namely, pants, yoga pants, leggings and workout pants; Infant clothing, namely, pants, and leggings; Outdoor winter clothing, namely, pants, yoga pants, leggings, workout pants and jackets; Outdoor winter footwear; Socks; Sports clothing, namely, pants, yoga pants, leggings and workout pants, none of the foregoing being made in whole or in part out of denim | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | online retail store services for clothing; retail store services connected with the sale of clothing; wholesale retail store services for clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 25, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |