USPTO serial 90461578
RESULTANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAYABYAB, EDWARD TAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RESULTANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zach Gordon
ZACH GORDON TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER1 INDIANA SQUARE, SUITE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240-2807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business data analytics consultancy; business intelligence consultancy; business project management consultancy; information technology consultancy; technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; programming of computer application software for others; computer programming and software and application design; website design and development; computer systems integration services; financial data analytics consultancy; providing counseling and consulting in the field of healthcare insurance benefits, namely, population health management services; business management consulting; business organization consulting; business consultation in the field of business process improvement and enterprise architecture development; corporate planning and consultation; financial consulting; consultation services in the field of financial management; financial risk management consultation; chief financial officer services; consulting services in the field of business management, namely, small business consulting services; facilitating and implementing the Entrepreneur Operating System methodologies, Value Builder System methodologies, and Dream Manager methodologies in providing business advancement tools and mentorship; providing strategic transition and exit planning services; executive coaching to facilitate growth and improving organizational efficiencies; team building services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |