Drawing for CLEARMASK

USPTO serial 90462522

CLEARMASK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CLEARMASK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Beard

John L. Beard BUTZEL LONG1909 K STREET NWSUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Face masks for use by dental care providers; Face masks for use by health care providers; Sanitary masks for dust isolation for medical purposes; Sanitary masks for dust prevention for medical purposes; Sanitary masks for fungus isolation purposes; Sanitary masks for germ isolation purposes; Sanitary masks for medical wellness purposes; Sanitary masks for pollen isolation purposes; Sanitary masks for virus isolation purposes; Surgical masksACTIVEMay 28, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2022MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 24, 2022MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 24, 2022ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Feb 10, 2022RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Feb 10, 2022RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2022RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Feb 9, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 8, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2022INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jan 31, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 31, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 26, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2021GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 29, 2021GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 29, 2021CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2021MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance