USPTO serial 90463752
GORILLA GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GORILLA GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Jacobson
David S. Jacobson GORDON & JACOBSON, P.C.60 LONG RIDGE RD., SUITE 407STAMFORD, CT 06902United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Refrigerator and freezer trays, namely, food trays made specifically for use with freezers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Mirror; shower mirror; knee support pillow; leg support pillow; chair; gaming chair; curtain rings; plastic inserts for use as container liners | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Food serving tray that also fits into freezers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hills Point Industries, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hills Point Industries, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named GORILLA GRIP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2022 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |