Drawing for NOORJEHAN

USPTO serial 90463938

NOORJEHAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HILL, JAMES T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOORJEHAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samuel Friedman

Samuel Friedman SAMUEL FRIEDMAN, P.C.225 BROADWAY, SUITE 3800NEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dried peas, processed peas, dried split peas, processed split peas, ghee, clarified butter, vegetable oils for food; Dried beans, processed beans; Dried lentils, processed lentilsACTIVEDec 31, 1988
030Noodles, vermicelli; Dried quinoa, processed quinoaACTIVEDec 31, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 18, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 18, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 17, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 16, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 5, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 4, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 30, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 16, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 30, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 25, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 23, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 1, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 1, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 31, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 27, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 13, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 16, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance