Drawing for IAP 2

USPTO serial 90472626

IAP 2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, CLINTON J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IAP 2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD J KOCH

RONALD J KOCH THE ELEY LAW FIRMPO BOX 388WORTHINGTON, OH 43085UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007alternatorsACTIVE—
012Vehicle electrification equipment, namely, power distribution modules, high voltage distribution modules, electrical power distribution units, power invertersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 1, 2023EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 18, 2023RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 28, 2023GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2023GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2023CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 28, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 13, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 13, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 12, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 12, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance