Drawing for DVALA

USPTO serial 90472882

DVALA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DVALA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DI LI

Di Li Di Li Law, P.C.P.O. BOX 5100HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91745UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cups; Dishware; Automatic soap dispensers; Bottle openers; Buckets of woven fabric; Candle holders; Cleaning brushes for household use; Coffee servers; Cookery molds; Crockery, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, serving bowls and trays; Electric aromatherapy oil diffusers; Electric face cleansing brushes; Electrical toothbrushes; Glass jars; Gloves for household purposes; Household containers for foods; Household strainers for juice; Kitchen grinders, non-electric; Tea sets; Works of art of crystalACTIVEJan 9, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2021CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Aug 4, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2021WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
May 27, 2021WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance