USPTO serial 90487458
FUSE BEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OJEYEMI, ASHLEY CHRISTINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUSE BEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glendale, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Don Thornburgh
Don Thornburgh DON THORNBURGH LAW CORPORATION466 FOOTHILL BLVD. #220LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, CA 91011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Advertising-supported, video-on-demand (AVOD) transmission services, distributed via online networks and mobile networks; linear free advertising-supported streaming service featuring audiovisual material distributed via online networks and mobile networks; Subscription Video on Demand (SVOD) transmission services; Transactional Video on Demand (TVOD) transmission services; Provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via an online video-on-demand service; Streaming of audiovisual and multimedia content via the Internet through connected devices; electronic transmission and delivery of audiovisual and multimedia content via connected devices; video-on-demand transmission services; Broadcasting programs via a global computer network; Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; Mobile media services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; Video transmission over digital networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of music, entertainment, news and reality; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring music, entertainment, news, and reality; Entertainment services, namely, the provision of non-downloadable continuing programs, segments and shows featuring music, entertainment, news, and reality delivered by online and wireless networks; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of entertainment; Programming and scheduling of programs via the Internet; Providing information and news in the field of entertainment via the Internet; Production and scheduling of television programs distributed via audio and video media and wireless communications, wired communications and global computer networks; Providing non-downloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music and entertainment, all on-line via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |