Drawing for LEGENDARY GAMBLERS

USPTO serial 90490205

LEGENDARY GAMBLERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAN DEN ABEELEN, DEREK C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGENDARY GAMBLERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto S. Terzoli

Roberto S. Terzoli Seyfarth Shaw LLP975 F Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20004United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable video game software; Downloadable computer game software for personal computers and home video game consolesACTIVE—
016Stationery; Note papers; Blank note cards; Printed note cardsACTIVE—
025Apparel, namely, hats, beanies, baseball caps, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, and sweatpantsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, planning, organizing, conducting, and hosting events and tournaments in the field of video games and sports betting; Conducting and providing facilities for video gaming contests and tournaments; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games; providing online, non-downloadable video game software; providing online non-downloadable computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video gamesACTIVE—
042Designing and developing computer game software and video game software for use with computers; Computer programming of video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 5, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 6, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 6, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 7, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2022GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 22, 2022GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 22, 2022CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 12, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance