USPTO serial 90490570
KICMAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTIAGO, ALEXIS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KICMAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chengde, Hebei, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEIYU BAO
18 LUARD ROAD, WAN CHAIUNIT D, 16/F, ONE CAPITAL PLACEHONG KONG, 999077Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Balls for games; Body-building apparatus; Children's educational toys for developing fine motor, oral language, numbers, counting, colors and alphabet skills sold in a fabric bag which has a clear vinyl window for viewing small trinkets and toys securely contained within the bag itself; Children's multiple activity toys; Fitness equipment, namely, straps used for yoga and other fitness activities and for carrying a yoga mat; Hand-powered non-mechanical flying toy; Infant exercise seats, namely, jumpers and infant saucers; Manually-operated exercise equipment for physical fitness purposes; Mechanical action toys; Plastic character toys; Remote control toy glider, airplane and sailplane equipment, namely, launchers, engines, propellers; Remote control toys, namely, cars, race cars, airplanes, boats; Remote controls for toy cars, planes; Skipping rope; Stacking toys; Stuffed and plush toys; Toy tricycles for children; Toys for domestic pets; Trading card games; Video game interactive remote control units | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |