USPTO serial 90491730
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig Kuchii
Craig Kuchii SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.2 INDEPENDENCE WAYINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT.PRINCETON, NJ 08540| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Oral contraceptives | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |