USPTO serial 90494907
IMAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEATHER E. BALMAT
HEATHER E. BALMAT BALMAT LAW, PLLC977 SEMINOLE TR., #342CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | video-on-demand transmission services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, production of talent shows for entertainment purposes; Film distribution; Film distribution services; Distribution of movies; Distribution of movie films; Distribution of motion pictures; Distribution of television programs; Distribution of cinema films; Distribution of television shows; Production and distribution of movies; Distribution of motion picture films; Production and distribution of movie films; Production and distribution of motion pictures; Production and distribution of television programs; Production and distribution of cinema films; Production and distribution of motion picture films; Music video production services; Production and distribution of sound, movie and video recordings; Digital video, audio and multimedia entertainment publishing services; video production; Providing films, not downloadable, via video-on-demand services; Providing television programs, not downloadable, via video-on-demand transmission services; Provision of non-downloadable films and television programs via a video-on-demand service; Music video production; Video production services; Video film production; Augmented reality video production; Film and video production; Media production services, namely, video and film production; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of development, production and post-production services in the fields of video and films; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Entertainment services, namely, production of special effects including model-making services, computer-generated imagery and computer-generated graphics for the production of motion pictures, videos, and movie trailers; Entertainment services, namely, storytelling; Production of visual effects for videos, DVDs, television and for internet web sites; Production of movie special effects; production of Special effects for films; production of Special effects for television; Preparation of special effects for entertainment purposes, namely, special effects design for others; Special effects animation services for film and video; video production services, namely, augmented reality and virtual reality video production services and virtual production pipeline services; Digital Distribution services, namely, provision of nondownloadable films and television programmes via a video-on-demand service; Content Security, namely, maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; entertainment services, namely, providing Multi Screen Experiences featuring Multiple user Profiles and multiple languages, namely, online multiplayer video games | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |