Drawing for US AI

USPTO serial 90495268

US AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with US AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura M. Konkel

Laura M. Konkel MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP790 N. WATER STREET, STE. 2500MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software using blockchain and artificial intelligence to predict the presence of disease and provide an immutable digital provenance for contact tracing and disease analysis; downloadable software using blockchain and artificial intelligence to facilitate global emergency responseACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that uses artificial intelligence to facilitate the extraction of critical business insights and predictions for price optimization, compliance, risk, and fraud; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that uses blockchain and artificial intelligence to predict the presence of disease and provide an immutable digital provenance for contact tracing and disease analysis; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that uses blockchain and artificial intelligence to facilitate global emergency responseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 30, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 27, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance