Drawing for LEATHERNECKS

USPTO serial 90498154

LEATHERNECKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEATHERNECKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH D. HODLER, ESQ.

316 E 92ND ST 2RENEW YORK, NY 10128UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
200Indicating membership in a(n) to indicate membership in a motorcycle clubACTIVEDec 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 20, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2024EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 20, 2023GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2023GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2023CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 25, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 25, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 25, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 18, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 18, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 21, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 21, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2021ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 1, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2021LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Aug 18, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 2, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance