Drawing for ROBOSENSE

USPTO serial 90502381

ROBOSENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERDMAN, RACHEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBOSENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DENNIS S. PRAHL

DENNIS S. PRAHL LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicle for locomotion by land, air, water or rail, namely, land vehicles, airplanes, boats, and trains; motor buses; cars; driverless cars; autonomous cars; robotic cars; bodies for vehicles; bicycles; air vehicles for transport; boats.ACTIVEJan 5, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 23, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 22, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2022SNEASU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2022SNEASU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2022SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 7, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 11, 2022EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 21, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2021MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 4, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance