USPTO serial 90502617
UPC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YANG, KATRINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UPC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A. PLUMLEY
DAVID A. PLUMLEY LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPP.O. BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric luminescent display panels, Light emitting diode (LED) displays, OLED (organic light emitting diode) display panels, flat panel display screens, and LCD large-screen displays, all as components of computer monitors, digital signage, digital signage display panels, video monitors, television monitors, televisions, smartphones, wearable video display monitors, video screens, and cameras; Electronic display screens as a component of digital cameras; Electronic display screens sold as an integral component of smart phones; Display panels as a component of televisions in the nature of Liquid crystal display (LCD) televisions and flat panel display screens; Flexible flat panel displays as a component of computers; Video display screens as a component of portable communications apparatus, namely, smartphones, tablet computers and smart watches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |