USPTO serial 90505467
90FUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 90FUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shanghai Runmi Technology Co., Ltd.
Zone, 201612, Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shanghai Runmi Technology Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Runmi Technology Co., Ltd.
Zone, 201612, Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shanghai Runmi Technology Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paulo A. de Almeida
Paulo A. de Almeida PATEL & ALMEIDA, P. C.16830 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video recorders; Camcorders; Cameras; Cinematographic cameras; Selfie sticks; Tripods for cameras; Smartglasses; Stands adapted for laptops; Hand-held 3D scanners; Computer peripheral devices; Pedometers; Head-clip cell phone holders; Cases for smartphones; USB cables; Eyeglasses; Batteries, electric; Photographic instruments, namely, exposure meters for photographic devices; Cinematographic machines and apparatus; Tilting heads for cameras; Smartphone camera lenses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |