USPTO serial 90510788
KACEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KACEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Richman
Monica B. Richman DENTONS US LLPP.O. BOX 1302CHICAGO, IL 60604United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Downloadable software in the nature of artificial intelligence enabled technology applications for managing risks, learning interactions, reporting, and managing contracts; Downloadable software in the nature of artificial intelligence enabled technology applications to provide intelligence, insights and automation to enhance third party security program in the field of cyber security risks; Downloadable software in the nature of artificial intelligence enabled technology applications to identify third-party intelligence, provide risk assessment, provide data automation, provide contract management, provide vendor tiering, and provide efficiency analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Providing online non-downloadable software in the nature of artificial intelligence enabled technology applications for managing risks, learning interactions, reporting, and managing contracts; providing online non-downloadable software in the nature of artificial intelligence enabled technology applications to provide intelligence, insights and automation to enhance third party security program in the field of cyber security risks; providing online non-downloadable software in the nature of artificial intelligence enabled technology applications to identify third-party intelligence, provide risk assessment, provide data automation, provide contract management, provide vendor tiering, and provide efficiency analysis; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence to identify, evaluate, mitigate, respond, assess, recommend, integrate and communicate cyber security risks and perform third-party management; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for cyber security risk management, performance and analysis; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for the purpose of the evaluation and management of cyber security risks and performing cyber security assessment and management services; consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence technology relating to cyber security risks and third party management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2026 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 11, 2026 | EPGS | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE AND REQUEST TO DELETE 1B OR G/S | — |
| May 4, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |