USPTO serial 90511322
BRIGHT CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRIGHT CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
April Besl
April Besl DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP255 E. FIFTH ST, SUITE 1900CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamps; table lamps; desk lamps; floor lamps; light bulbs; Smart light bulbs in the nature of light bulbs comprised primarily of a light bulb and also featuring electronic chip cards that send and receive data to smartphones, tablet computers and portable computers for controlling the light bulb; Electric track lighting units; Strip lighting for indoor use; Pendant lighting fixtures; Lighting fixtures installed flush against a surface; chandeliers; Lighting fixtures that incorporate a hanging lighting feature; Recessed lights in the nature of downlights; Lighting fixtures for kitchen islands; Lighting fixtures for bathroom vanity; Antimicrobial lamps in the nature of a germicidal lamps for purifying the air; Antimicrobial table lamps in the nature of a germicidal lamps for purifying the air; Antimicrobial desk lamps in the nature of a germicidal lamps for purifying the air; Antimicrobial floor lamps in the nature of a germicidal lamps for purifying the air; Antimicrobial light bulbs in the nature of germicidal light bulbs for purifying the air; Antimicrobial smart light bulbs in the nature of germicidal light bulbs for purifying the air comprised primarily of a light bulb and also featuring electronic chip cards that send and receive data to smartphones, tablet computers and portable computers for controlling the light bulb; Germicidal electric track lighting units for purifying the air; Germicidal Strip lighting for indoor use for purifying the air; Antimicrobial pendant lighting fixtures in the nature of germicidal lighting fixtures for purifying the air; Antimicrobial lighting fixtures installed flush against a surface in the nature of germicidal lighting fixtures for purifying the air; Antimicrobial chandeliers in the nature of germicidal lighting fixtures for purifying the air; Antimicrobial lighting fixtures that incorporate a hanging lighting feature in the nature of germicidal lighting fixtures for purifying the air; Antimicrobial recessed lights in the nature of germicidal downlights that purify the air; Antimicrobial lighting fixtures for kitchen islands in the nature of germicidal lighting fixtures for purifying the air; Antimicrobial lighting fixtures for bathroom vanity in the nature of germicidal lighting fixtures for purifying the air; Germicidal lighting in the nature of lamps that clean and disinfect and purify the air, namely, light emitting diodes (LEDs), namely, infrared wavelengths for generating light rays; germicidal LED-based lamps for disinfecting surfaces; disinfecting lamps housed in a container for disinfecting objects placed therein | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |