USPTO serial 90512246
IZM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 694
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAN DEN ABEELEN, DEREK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IZM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC SANDS
ERIC SANDS Sands Angel Trademarks64 Bank St.Abington, MA 02351UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Strollers; Air bags; Anti-theft alarms for vehicles; Anti-theft devices for vehicles; Antitheft devices for vehicles; Ashtrays for automobiles; Automobile bodies; Bags adapted for strollers; Brake pads for automobiles; Bumpers for automobiles; Covers for vehicle steering wheels; Electric drives for vehicles; Head-rests for vehicle seats; Hoods for vehicle engines; Hoods for vehicles; Luggage carriers for vehicles; Motorcycle chains; Motorcycle frames; Motorcycle saddles; Non-skid devices for vehicle tires, namely, non-skid chains; Panniers adapted for motorcycles; Pet strollers; Push scooters; Rearview mirrors; Safety seats for children, for vehicles; Safety seats for use in cars; Self-balancing boards; Self-balancing scooters; Shock absorbers for automobiles; Shock absorbing springs for vehicles; Spare tire covers; Stroller covers; Sun-blinds adapted for automobiles; Suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; Upholstery for vehicles; Vehicle bumpers; Vehicle running boards; Back-up warning alarms for vehicles; Vehicle parts, namely, windshield wipers | ACTIVE | Dec 30, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2022 | ISCO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |