Drawing for MINDBLOOM

USPTO serial 90515706

MINDBLOOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEINPFAD, SARAH E
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINDBLOOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. Lee

David C. Lee AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP2001 K STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035doctor referral services via an Internet websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 1, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 23, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 1, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 8, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 8, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2022NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 1, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 17, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 25, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance