USPTO serial 90517029
1DROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OAKES, JEFFREY ALLEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 1DROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coconut Creek, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal extracts for medical purposes; Medicinal herb extracts; Medicinal herbal extracts for medical purposes; Nutritional food additives for medical purposes in the nature of natural food extracts derived from hemp; Plant extracts for medical, veterinary and pharmaceutical purposes; Plant extracts for pharmaceutical purposes | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2022 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |