USPTO serial 90518212
KWESST INTELLIGENT MICRO SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSCATI, JUSTIN RONALD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KWESST INTELLIGENT MICRO SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Cartona, Esq.
Michael D. Cartona, Esq. GROGAN, TUCCILLO & VANDERLEEDEN, LLP1350 MAIN STREET5TH FLOOR, SUITE 508SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Embedded computer software and hardware for the operation of unmanned aerial vehicles, counter-drone systems for defense, electronic decoy systems, ground laser defense systems, smart ordinance systems for tracking shots fired and tracking firearm degradation and weapon fire control systems; Embedded computer application software for use in real-time streaming of situational awareness data from drones, mortar launchers, infantry and vehicle mounted weaponry; Embedded computer software and hardware for creating network capabilities of soldiers and responders to keep them safe while increasing their operational effectiveness through real-time streaming of situational awareness | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development of new products for others; Research and development of new products for others in the field of military intelligence and military combat; Design and development of computer software and hardware comprised of sensors, software, microoptics, ballistic algorithms, and artificial intelligence for situational awareness and targeting for operation by soldiers and operational assets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 10, 2021 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 10, 2021 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |