Drawing for SOF RESTAURANT GROUP

USPTO serial 90523229

SOF RESTAURANT GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOF RESTAURANT GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Devin Ricci

Robert Devin Ricci KEAN MILLER LLP909 POYDRAS STREET, SUITE 3600NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 6, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 6, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 6, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 7, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 7, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 7, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 7, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 7, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 7, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 15, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance