USPTO serial 90530436
SMARTPAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTPAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ABAZAR MIRESHGHI
Abazar Mireshghi LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPP.O. BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS DEVICES FOR ESTABLISHING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND WIRELESSLY TRANSMITTING DATA BETWEEN TRACTORS, TRAILERS AND CHASSIS; WIRELESS DEVICES FOR WIRELESSLY DETECTING UNIQUE IDENTIFIERS OF TRAILERS AND CHASSIS BY TRACTORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 16, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 22, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |